Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Wed 24/04/24 12:51:36 GMT |
Message # 22684.1.1.1 Subject: Let mr clairafy.......... Date: Sat 27/05/06 08:27:04 GMT Name: Mike Email: swimlvr591@aol.com |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
What Im saying, is dont post any pictures of girls with a real thin shirt on and no bra with her tits showing just as much as if she didnt have a shirt on at all. Y'know, dont show some girl with her legs spread open playing with herself. To you and I, that would be ok, but your putting something on a public, non restricted site......it just wouldnt be right. Think of it like this.....I have a 5yr old little girl who I take to a public "lake-front" beach. I would'nt like the idea of someone sitting near by (whom after they seen a introduction on your page of the above mentioned), thinking that if my daughter goes in with clothes on, that I would be getting my jollies, when that would be the farthest from my mind. Your lucky, your in a country where pretty much anything goes. Here in my hometown, a father could be arrested and put in jail if someone told the police your having sexual thoughts about his own daughter, and they base that judgement on the fact that they seen your discription of wetlook as a sexual thing cos they seen pictures of nude horny girls in your description. I guess what Im trying to explain is use a wide sprectrum in your description. You understand what Im trying to say? I mean yea, to some a nude girl is pure extacy, but to me, and others, the clothed girl is more of my preferance, and to another, a girl in just panties is thier preferance. Aughhh.....now Im confused. Just keep the pics PG rated. thats all.
|
In reply to Message (22684.1.1) So ....
By Telcontar - mrnemesis@ntlworld.com Sat 27/05/06 07:43:28 GMT You'd only suggest we post photos of modelled wetlook? Does your fear extended to modelled candid, the sorts of shoots that Liquid Ladies do where the girls just have fun in front of the camera but are still paid to do it with the full awareness that it's a wetlook shoot? Would these in your opinion still freak girls out?
I certainly had no intention to post anything gratuitous or nude, as that's not quite the point! Although of course most of us like naked people too :) |
In reply to Message (22684.1) Be careful of what ya use, cos.....
By Mike - swimlvr591@aol.com Sat 27/05/06 06:56:02 GMT Just dont show a bunch of nudity cos to me, it gives others the impression that we are a bunch of perverts, and could jepordize the candid situations. Girls may not want to swim in clothes for the fear of giving some stranger a cheap thrill. People who are not into wetlook dont fully understand, and seem to make too quick of judgements, well here in the USA anyway. |
In reply to Message (22684) Producers: photos needed for Wikipedia!
By Telcontar - mrnemesis@ntlworld.com Sat 27/05/06 06:46:07 GMT As part of my plan to update and improve the wetlook page on Wikipedia -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wetlook -- I'd like to add some illustrations of wetlook to the page. This is so that people get a visual depiction of what we're up to, and to make the page look a little less ... dry. But I don't just mean photos of obvious situations such as playing in hotel pool in a t-shirt and bathing suit to avoid sunburn, but maybe more of an indication of the more fetishy side to it that most people won't encounter.
There's a limit to how many pictures you can sensibly put on a page without overcrowding it or, in this case, looking too pushy, and for the present size of the article, I'd say two would be enough. Personally I am thinking -- and please, please feel free to make better suggestions -- one candid and one modelled. The candid one I would like from someone like Leon where the subjects know they're being filmed really and won't complain! I'm thinking maybe a beach scene, people swimming in clothes. Blurred faces look horrible so maybe one where no-one's facing the camera or those who are, are too far away.
For modelled, a business suit photo from the likes of Styx, jmmphotos or Wetlook Unlimited. We know from Webshots that girls already do play in pools in party clothes, but wet business suits are a definite rarity yet are popular within the wetlook scene and would nicely illustrate the idea of getting wet in unusual clothes.
Because these need to be copyright-free images (Wikipedia's requirements), I need to make a special appeal to you to help Wikipedia and even the wetlook cause by improving the reference page on the subject on Wikipedia. All I can offer personally is photos of me, but being a bloke, that's only going to induce vomiting!
Thanks
Daniel. (And I'm not affiliated with Wikipedia, I just want to see the wetlook page become a really nice guide to the subject. And Wikipedia is really cool!)
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.026 seconds to generate ]