Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Wed 24/04/24 19:48:31 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 22311.3

Subject: Re: Appeal to Wetlook producers

Date: Sun 07/05/06 11:13:46 GMT

Name: RoscoeBC

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

Your tastes are much like mine. Dresses first, then skirts. I'd also add business suits, particularly expensive looking fitted suits. I'm influenced a lot by the naughty or defiance factor (is she really going to risk ruining that?), especially if she looks like shes doing something deviant to turn me on, so elegant looking stuff that a woman wouldn't normally risk messing up in score big points, wedding dresses, formals, fitted suits, silk blouses, especially stuff that really looks wet when it gets wet. If it gets transparent enough to see lace underwear or nibbies (which I prefer changes day to day), so much the better.

But I think preferences are probably related to the origin of the individual's wetlook fetish. If someone as a kid discovered the attractiveness of a girls butt for the first time when a girl got wet in jeans and they got shiney and clingy and attracted his attention, they may be a jeans fan forever. If someone got thier first glimpse of a girls form when a girl got rained on in a dress and her dress went clingy and transparent, he's probably a dress guy for life. I don't think arguing what is sexier, jeans or dresses, will ever change anybodies mind, because that would require that the fetish follow logic, and nobody has been able to make much of a case for a logical basis for wetlook, it just is, like most preferences. Plain old porn probably makes more sense. We all need to just figure out what works for us, and then try to find a woman who doesn't need a logical explanation to want to turn on their man. I'm lucky in that regard, got the wife in the shower in a fitted skirt suit, tight white stretch cotton/lycra blouse, stockings and heels yesterday :). She doesn't enjoy it much herself, but she likes what it does for me :).

In reply to Message (22311)

Appeal to Wetlook producers

By Reuben - Sun 07/05/06 10:14:25 GMT

Website:

Hi all,

I've been watching this forum for a few weeks now. LOVE IT. Been a Wetlook fan as long as I have memories.

My preference is for dresses, and to a lesser degree skirts. It seems to me there is an overabundance of wetlook on the web, candid and otherwise, that involves jeans and t-shirts. Boring. To me they all look the same. And there's something abou the way the material of certain dresses clings to the legs, the butt. Some producers (I'm not going ot advertise for them) seem to concentrate on dresses and skirts, please keep it up. Many mix in quite a bit of jeanswear. But it seems to me the varietal possibilites of dresses are endless. They don't need to be see-thru when wet, or "stripper" style micro skirts. Gowns behave completely different; Sometimes you can't even tell they're wet.

I'm babbling; my point is, there's nothing sexier than a sexy woman in a sexy dress (type for party, reception, or date) getting soaking wet. So I'm asking for wetlook producers to update their wardrobes with stylish sexy dresses. that's it. Do I have some suppoert for this campaign?

Rube

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)