Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 25/04/24 22:13:01 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 21780.7.1

Subject: Re: Re: poll: Do you enjoy pictures where the woman is only partly wet?

Date: Thu 13/04/06 14:28:10 GMT

Name: Martin S

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

I agree to your remarks regarding webshots, Sopping - these group shots of damp/wet girls after something are very much alike.... and I feel getting bored about these too.... although I keep posting at least the better ones. I understand it as a compromise as it is getting harder and harder to find new and really good ones in webshots. A bit overharvested, that (if this is a valid expression?).

Good half wet shots can be extremely amazing for me

In reply to Message (21780.7)

Re: poll: Do you enjoy pictures where the woman is only partly wet?

By Sopping - Thu 13/04/06 13:09:40 GMT

Website:

I'll give you a variant on that. I am getting increasingly bored with the webshots of girls who are "wet after the rain/waterpark/pool/fountain"etc. They all are very much alike. Please don't tell me not to go there. I have to click on the url and bring them up to see what the photos look like. To me, shots of girls in the water, even if only partially wet, are preferable to the "Stacey and me soaked" photos which are almost dominant on webshots these days.

I appreciate the efforts of the posters, believe me. Many of them post real "in the pool, in the water, etc." pix, for which I am grateful. It is just I can now go a very long time without downloading yet another of the smiling soaked, or partially soaked, groups.

Sorry, but that's the way it is.

And again, in regard to partially wet, I enjoy shots of girls wading in the sea or in a stream if only partially wet.

In reply to Message (21780)

poll: Do you enjoy pictures where the woman is only partly wet?

By Desert Hawk - Thu 13/04/06 10:45:57 GMT

Website:

I was wondering how many of us like to see pictures where the woman's clothes are only partly wet, and how many of us only care to see clothes completely soaked. I think most of us including myself certainly prefer complete soakings. However a partly wet picture is better than nothing. In some cases, a partly wet picture can be better than fully wet if the wetness produces a nice pattern, expecially on fabric that shows a high contrast between wet and dry. I find nice paintball-like splatters attractive. Also, partly wet remains noticeable a lot longer than fully wet. When clothes are completely wet, it is often not possible to tell after the initial glistening fades, clinging stops, and the dripping subsides, but splatters or streaks against a dry background remain noticeable for a long time. I am also intrigued when I am riding a water ride and there is a woman who does not want to get wet. They will often duck down and put their arms in front of them. This often results in drenched hair, shoulders, and breasts, siome streaks down the stomach and back, and relatively dry pants. It is comical to watch their strange attempts to stay dry, when the obvious way to stay dry would be to not ride it at all. So what do you think? Should I keep posting webshots that only show partly wet clothes, or am I wasting people's time with these?

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)