Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 29/03/24 15:52:50 GMT |
Message # 21664.1.1.1.1.1 Subject: You don't have children do you? If you right such crap! Date: Sun 09/04/06 06:11:33 GMT Name: Andrew |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
If you did have children you probobly would get really pissed of while seeing pics of 14, 15 etc year olds posted to adult sites as this one. And it really doesn't matter if the girl is from webshots or is a "famous actress". I have a daughter and when I see pice of young teenagers (from movies, webshots, dating sites) posted here, for the viewing pleasure of men of all ages I get really mad. This is a fetish forum, not a photography forum. And there is quite a simple test you can do if you think wetlook photos of young girls are OK. Take a 14 year old. Do some wetlook shots. Make a site. Post them. And wait for the police. You can then give them the bullshit you write here :-/
Andrew. |
In reply to Message (21664.1.1.1.1) Re: Oh come one :-D I was talking about...
By G.O.P. - Sat 08/04/06 16:29:00 GMT it doesn't matter if you're talking about a video of a wet 15 year old cocker spaniel! Simply being wet doesn't make a vidoe/pciture pornography, even if it is on a "wetlook fetish site!"
No, I am not interested in wet animals! Like Rush Limbaugh, I am demonstrating absurdity by being absurd! |
In reply to Message (21664.1.1.1) Oh come one :-D I was talking about...
By Andrew - Fri 07/04/06 12:40:11 GMT a video of a 15 year old girl ON A WETLOOK FETISH SITE... :-D |
In reply to Message (21664.1.1) Re: Re: Update!
By G.O.P. - Fri 07/04/06 11:56:58 GMT Harry Potter considered child pornography? I don't think so! Last time I checked, it was rated PG13 (US ratings), not NC17. You are being very paraniod if you think the authorities care if you watch Harry Potter! Well, maybe if you live in an Islamic Republic, the occult content could get you into trouble with the religious police. Posting a copyrighted movie clip might be a violation of the copyright law. And the rules of this forum prohibit advertising it on here, since the subject is under 16. But it is certainly not pornography! |
In reply to Message (21664.1) Re: Update!
By Andrew - Fri 07/04/06 09:52:07 GMT Hi! Please note that Emma Watson is not of age. She will be turning 16 soon, but at the moment she isn't even 16 and she certinaly wasn't when the Goblet Of Fire was shot. And of course the girl playing Fleur's sister is even younger. Not sure about the girl playing Cho, but putting that aside I would advise you to be careful. Don't know if Germany has some kind of Internet police and if it acts as in some other countries, but if it does the clip might land your site in trouble, especially with all that histeria around (treating wetlook as erotic material by many institutions - MK wrote about it in association to billing companies). Anyway, I'm not critisizing, I like your site and you do have some great clips, just wanted to warn you. Not sure if there is a threat in your country, but I thought you might want to know (as many people think that Emma is of legal age, though she is not). Andrew. |
In reply to Message (21664) Update!
By Wetlook Dreams - bestellungen@wetlook-dreams.de Fri 07/04/06 08:06:06 GMT Website: http://www.wetlook-dreams.de Update!
Harry Potter Feuerkelch - Clip Download
Nice Wetlook Scenes in this Movie !
In Top 720x576 DVD Qualität!!!
2:01 - 145 MB - mpg
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.025 seconds to generate ]