Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 29/03/24 15:01:36 GMT |
Message # 2064.2.2 Subject: Re: Re: baptism - I'm uncomfortable with these Date: Thu 30/01/03 08:12:51 GMT Name: Renegade 17 + Green Email: splishsplash@wamfox.co.uk Website: http://www.wamfox.com |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I find myself agreeing with you, Sopping. I've also long been uncomfortable with what is generally called "candid" wetlook, especially when it is sold, as this undercuts the genuine commercial producers who pay their models for the work. I don't mean things like Leon's work, where the people in the pictures know they are being photographed, but the stuff shot with long lenses from behind bushes, or hotel balconies, or somewhere else where the photographer uses optical technology to capture what the participants think are "private" moments.
Interestingly, the UK govt has just announced a major shake-up in our sex laws, including creating a new offence of "voyuerism" meaning to watch others (presumably without their consent) in public for sexual gratification. Obviously this is mainly targetted at "peeping toms", and I've not seen the actual legislation, just news reports of the announcement, but it is an interesting development.
- Renegade 17.
|
In reply to Message (2064.2) Re: baptism - I'm uncomfortable with these
By Sopping - Thu 30/01/03 04:25:20 GMT I am uncomfortable with using someone's religious beliefs as an element of satisfying our (and yes I include me) own fetish-driven urges to view wet clothed females.
I remember a posting, not too long ago, of a grieving Korean rushing into the sea at a funeral.
I remember (it was much smaller then) a posting of people wading into the ocean at the memorial for TWA Flt 800 victims.
And now, belatedly I admit, I am having similar misgivings about the "use' of batism photos, in this forum and elsewhere.
I believe there are sufficient wetlook female photos about that we do not have to "intrude" into religious practices.
At least that is how I see it.. and disagree as you may.
S: |
In reply to Message (2064) baptism
By Tommy - Wed 29/01/03 18:22:25 GMT Website: http://mashiah.org/gallery/Baptizm?&page=1 http://mashiah.org/gallery/Baptizm?&page=1 |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.093 seconds to generate ]