Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 20/04/24 07:51:22 GMT |
Message # 18246.2 Subject: Re: LARGEST wetlook pics available? Date: Thu 15/09/05 07:44:31 GMT Name: AnthonyX Email: anthonyx@jowc.net |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
The pics I shot (5 megapixel camera) were almost all done at highest resolution (2592 x 1944). It's adequate for printing but close to overkill for online viewing. For one thing, the JPEG-compressed images are all at least a megabyte, many in the range of 2 - 2.5 MB. It's not the sort of thing most webmasters want to host - just a bit too big. This is around the top end for current consumer gear, but isn't even the bottom end of pro. Good pro cameras will do something like 16 megapixels ( something like 6000 x 4000 pixels ). Jpeg compressed, the images will probably run in the neighborhood of 10MB each... definitely not the sort of thing anyone is likely to post very often.
Perhaps better to look for the real thing instead of just pictures... not that I've had much success, but it's been my approach.
|
In reply to Message (18246) LARGEST wetlook pics available?
By Detlef - dummedrecksau@gmx.de Thu 15/09/05 07:04:50 GMT Well it's kind of a fetish in my fetish. I love large pictures. I leave out most small ones I find. The larger the better. And as I know how to handle pics in ACDSee I can scale it the way I want it and zoom at the interesting parts just like using a digital camera and having that girl standing right in front of me... I wanna FEEL and TOUCH every wet spot.
Graham sent me the largest wetlook picture I've ever seen: http://www.styxfreeworld.com/pics/styxww-large.jpg
Anyone got a larger one? What do you think about large pictures?
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.001 seconds to generate ]