Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 25/04/24 12:07:56 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 17476.2

Subject: See-through and women...

Date: Wed 03/08/05 17:14:42 GMT

Name: Telcontar

Email: mrnemesis@ntlworld.com

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

Firstly, yes, a woman in wet clothes turns me on more than a nude woman, for the oft-given reason that is more teasing. You have to wait for what you want (the nudy bit) or you know you won't ever get it and it makes you want it more.

That said, though, I am not always so keen on see-through clothes. They spoil the tease for one thing and to me they don't even always look that good. Especially white ... wet white clothes don't have much of a shine from the water or change colour, and they don't tease you. There is also that wet clothes feel so lovely and smooth and wet, and the idea of feeling a woman through her wet clothes is much more appealing, breasts especially. The darker the clothes are, the better contrast you have for a wet shine, and in general darker clothes appeal to me more. (Dry white t-shirts tend to make me think of decorating the house, and wearing some worn-out old white t-shirt for the job :P)

(Apologies to the women reading this, but, a lovely compromise is a black top -- say, party wear -- that lets you see just the tops of a woman's breasts all wet and shiny and the rest are all snuggled by shiny black clothes.)

As for white clothes, it depends on the woman, the clothes (style and material) and the situation though. But one thing I definitely love is wet hair, which I realised as a child long before I also found that I liked wet clothing. Nothing spoils a wet photo like dry hair (unless the wet hair is in the next photo :), especially if the woman has kept it dry on purpose!

In reply to Message (17476)

Private parts

By wetimer - isthisobscureenough@yahoo.co.uk Wed 03/08/05 15:42:15 GMT

Website: http://forum.minxmovies.com/showc.cgi?17463.2

I absolutely agree with what anthonyx wrote in this link. I, for example, am straight in general, but when I can still get turned on by male wetlook. I guess I have bi tendencies in the context of wetlook. I think that there are plenty of guys who would not be prepared to admit something similar.

Now this is all related to another discussion, which is, how explicit do we like our photos? I think I speak for a lot of us when I say that seeing a wet fully clothed (or scantily clad but still covered in the essential places) girl is more of a turn on that a nude. I also think I speak for a lot of people in saying that see-thru tops are a turn on, see through bottoms can be, but often, see-thru vaginas are not. But if the tables are turned, how explicit would we want our wetlook males to be?

Personally I have no problem with anyone posting anything. I have seen pictures of guys in see thru boxers and been turned on by their erect members, and, yes, I do think this is at least partially because it reassures me that other people enjoy the same fetish (ie wetlook) that I do. However, there is no way that I would voluntarily look at gay porn, and I can understand why a lot of people would not feel as comfortable as I do about these crossover male-porn/wetlook photos.

If one of the reasons for posting male wetlook is to appeal to the ladies on this forum, what do they think? I understand that men are more aroused by visual stimuli than women anyway, but that is a generality. Are there exceptions out there? How explicit do you lot like your photos?

Wetimer

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)