minx

Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 28/03/24 15:13:50 GMT

Translate page FROM gb -> TO de fr it nl es pt jp

Translate page TO gb <- FROM de fr it nl es pt jp

MyWetloook

Message # 17375.1.2

Subject: Note Re: Re: No Subject OT

Date: Thu 28/07/05 16:17:56 GMT

Name: Anonymous us

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: Make Donation (you can change amount)

Previous Reply
Next New Message
Active List Archive

Unfortunately, I can believe it.  I often wonder if this is how prudish American society was in the years leading up to Prohibition.  Get this, there's a case in Philadelphia where a man was arrested for being a suspect in a brutal rape in a subway station a couple weeks ago.  The man arrested was a permanent resident of the US, originally from Mexico.  As it turns out, the actual assailant was the man's homeless half-brother, who looks very much like him.  So, just as they get ready to release him, Immigration & Naturalization decides they're going to open a deportation hearing based on laws written after 9/11 (I think based on the Patriot Act, but, admittedly, I don't know that for certain).  They are opening the proceedings based on an assault on a police officer from 1999.  INS tried to deport him then and an immigration judge decided not to.  Now they're trying to throw him out of the country based on a law written after the incident.  Now, I know I don't know a lot about immigration law, but doesn't this seem like enforcing an ex post facto law to anyone else?  Or double jeopardy?  The only thing I can think of is that immigration law is different than criminal law and therefore have lower constitutional standards?  I don't know, but in this case, it really seems to be contrary to the things this country is supposed to stand for.
In reply to Message (17375.1) Note Re: No Subject

By Alice D. - de Thu 28/07/05 15:28:51 GMT

Website:


I can't believe this can happen in a modern western country. Are you sure, it was because you viewed wetlook pictures? They can impossibly be so prudish. I can't beleive it. ... If you dropped your pants...well...okay...

I hope, you didn't.

But if you don't have an own PC - why don't you just go to an iternet cafe?

But the best you can do is buying your own PC and do what you want.

I hope you to be back here soon.

In reply to Message (17375) Angry No Subject

By my last post: must leave forum - us Thu 28/07/05 14:40:09 GMT

Website:


It is with sad regret that I must make this my last visit to this forum, at least until I get my own computer. I am the guy who posted last February that I don't have a computer and must use the internet from the library. The head librarian/thought police officer has now banned me from that branch for 40 days (I might be banned countywide when the other branches find out about it) and a threat of a lifetime ban if, after the 40 day suspension, I ever view "objectionable" material on library computers again.  Some self-richteous idiot complained about a picture of "teenagers making out". I am not sure exactly which picture this was referring to, but I think it is the webshot of the woman in the pink pants before being thrown in the pool by her boyfriend.  The librarian even admitted that the picture is not nude, but she said it is nonetheless "objectionable, borderline pornography, and not fit to be displayed in a public library where children might see it".  How this qualifies as "borderline pornography" is beyond my comprehension.  It seems that anything can be considered objectionable by some people, and when those people have power, the public gets screwed.  I suppose those pictures of rabbits being butchered in China that I looked at about a month ago (no, it mwasn't on this forum) would be "objectionable" too. It is a rare website that doesn't have the risk of an occasional f-word appearing on the screen, and some kid might read it!  The internet would be boring if I have to be super careful about what sites I visit.  Prior to the February warning, I did look at real porn. I haven't looked at any since then.  I thought the prohibition only covered porn, but I guess I was wrong.  Anyway, rather I am banned countywide or not, I can't risk visiting this forum again. I probably shouldn't look at any type of pictures of anything, as some idiot may be offended.  Text only with no cuss words, I guess. I gotta get my own computer and internet service. The thought police are making life online too hard here at the library!

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: Make Donation (you can change amount)

All WAM Drunk Sex Orgy Wetlook-Online
Clips4Sale

Minx Movies - M12 - Dressed in Wet is now in the Download Store
Download Store

Minx Movies - M15 - Wet Me Now is now in the Download Store
Download Store

Minx Movies - M14 - Get Wet With Me is now in the Download Store
2ipmd65.jpg2ipmdg2.jpgckfbj77.jpgjapgs25.jpgzgjbt99.jpg Download Store 2fpbs94.jpgkijws74.jpgrlsps97.jpglasbjg7.jpg2fptg96.jpg2gpdde7.jpg


Minx Movies - M8 - Mask Of Wetness is now in the Download Store
Download Store



[ This page took 0.013 seconds to generate ]