Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Wed 24/04/24 12:56:41 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 17375.1.1

Subject: Re: Re: No Subject

Date: Thu 28/07/05 16:12:29 GMT

Name: WetWillie

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

I am sorry to hear this also. If you were doing research I would bet they would have still found a way to censor it. The good news is that for $400 plust the cost of the monthly connection ($4.95 {PeoplePC dialup) or $18.95 DSL) you can be back in no time. Good luck and know that you aren't alone in your pursuit of wetness!

In reply to Message (17375.1)

Re: No Subject

By Alice D. - Thu 28/07/05 15:28:51 GMT

Website:

I can't believe this can happen in a modern western country. Are you sure, it was because you viewed wetlook pictures? They can impossibly be so prudish. I can't beleive it. ... If you dropped your pants...well...okay...

I hope, you didn't.

But if you don't have an own PC - why don't you just go to an iternet cafe?

But the best you can do is buying your own PC and do what you want.

I hope you to be back here soon.

In reply to Message (17375)

No Subject

By my last post: must leave forum - Thu 28/07/05 14:40:09 GMT

Website:

It is with sad regret that I must make this my last visit to this forum, at least until I get my own computer. I am the guy who posted last February that I don't have a computer and must use the internet from the library. The head librarian/thought police officer has now banned me from that branch for 40 days (I might be banned countywide when the other branches find out about it) and a threat of a lifetime ban if, after the 40 day suspension, I ever view "objectionable" material on library computers again. Some self-richteous idiot complained about a picture of "teenagers making out". I am not sure exactly which picture this was referring to, but I think it is the webshot of the woman in the pink pants before being thrown in the pool by her boyfriend. The librarian even admitted that the picture is not nude, but she said it is nonetheless "objectionable, borderline pornography, and not fit to be displayed in a public library where children might see it". How this qualifies as "borderline pornography" is beyond my comprehension. It seems that anything can be considered objectionable by some people, and when those people have power, the public gets screwed. I suppose those pictures of rabbits being butchered in China that I looked at about a month ago (no, it mwasn't on this forum) would be "objectionable" too. It is a rare website that doesn't have the risk of an occasional f-word appearing on the screen, and some kid might read it! The internet would be boring if I have to be super careful about what sites I visit. Prior to the February warning, I did look at real porn. I haven't looked at any since then. I thought the prohibition only covered porn, but I guess I was wrong. Anyway, rather I am banned countywide or not, I can't risk visiting this forum again. I probably shouldn't look at any type of pictures of anything, as some idiot may be offended. Text only with no cuss words, I guess. I gotta get my own computer and internet service. The thought police are making life online too hard here at the library!

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)