Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 29/03/24 02:29:41 GMT |
Message # 17287.1.1.1.2.1 Subject: Re: Re: Thanks for your response Date: Mon 25/07/05 10:37:22 GMT Name: G.O.P. |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Here we go again. Operation:Mindcrime! Someone wants to pass judgment about others'supposed "intent" with which they view something. I say bullshit! When you are in a public place (except a bathroom, of course), you are subject to being photographed or videotaped. There is absolutely nothing wrong with taking candid pictures in PUBLIC! Fully clothed wetlook pictures are not pornography, by any sane definition of the word, no mapper what any self-appointed thought police would say.
I didn't get to see the pictures. It says "member not found". It seems that most websites are getting delete-happy when anyone makes a "terms of service" complaint. Please re-post these pictures on another website. |
In reply to Message (17287.1.1.1.2) Re: Thanks for your response
By Anonymous - Sun 24/07/05 06:37:02 GMT Then don't look! |
In reply to Message (17287.1.1.1) Thanks for your response
By tricky dicky - Sat 23/07/05 19:16:53 GMT I can see your views but I'm still troubled by the fact that the majority of the people pictured were unaware they were being photographed. This is my personel feeling & I'm interested to see what other people feel |
In reply to Message (17287.1.1) Re: Lecherous pervert
By NorCalWet - cd2dvd@yahoo.com Sat 23/07/05 19:01:29 GMT I think "lecherous pervert" is a bit strong. Everyone was wearing clothing.
My understanding is that if the people in the picture were not readily identifiable, then it is acceptable. I was not peeking through a window into a private home, but standing in the doorway of a store (see forum rules of behavior).
If people in this forum feel that I have overstepped the bounds of decency, please let the forum know. I believe that it is within the category of candid public shots. And by the way, a lot of people were exiting the park smiling... |
In reply to Message (17287.1) Lecherous pervert
By tricky dicky - Sat 23/07/05 18:53:04 GMT Would the term Lecherous pervert be too strong?
Don't get me wrong I love wetlook but were any of these people aware they were about to appear on a website such as this..
Over the last couple of weeks I've witnessed some great wetlook in public places but unless it was a deliberate public display consider it immoral to take photo's let alone post them on the net....
Surely this is an infringement of personel and public rights..
If I'm wrong(legally) then I appologise for this outburst but I still have trouble accepting this practice as anything other than immoral |
In reply to Message (17287) my candid pics: rain drenched tourists exiting theme park
By NorCalWet - cd2dvd@yahoo.com Sat 23/07/05 18:21:58 GMT Website: http://public.fotki.com/scooter1/drenched_tourists/ While on vacation at a large theme park in Orlando, Florida, it began to rain in the late afternoon. This is not unusual, but it kept raining, and rained harder and harder. This was now very unusual. Tourists visiting the park were leaving in droves. I had my video camera ready, safe and dry and inside the shop door near the entrance. You can see my frame grabs to see what people did to avoid the rain: nothing. Most just walked quickly to the exit, getting totally drenched. Enjoy!
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.031 seconds to generate ]