Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 29/03/24 10:28:46 GMT |
Message # 1649.1 Subject: Re: Mud Buggy Queen -- Underage? Date: Sun 05/01/03 09:11:44 GMT Name: FountainFrolic Email: FntnFrolic@aol.com |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Hi Jim,
I'm personally against anything involving minors, and try to stay away from any of the "teen" pictures.
I think the reason you're not seeing people "up in arms" here though is BECAUSE of Nigel's rules - specifically, rule #5:
"Images of 16-18 year olds (classed as 'adults' in the UK and most of Europe) should be of a 'soft' nature, and not be overtly sexual."
Since the forum is hosted in the UK, and these are Nigel's rules, then I for one am refraining from comment in respect of that, even though I may personally disagree and would rather not see any images of 16-18 year olds.
That's my thought at least.
-FF- |
In reply to Message (1649) Mud Buggy Queen -- Underage?
By Jim - jim121272@aol.com Sun 05/01/03 08:51:40 GMT Website: http://www.wetlookunlimited.fws1.com Funny, everyone is always up in arms when pics/video of a MINOR are announced...but has anyone noticed that past recipients have been high school girls, 16-17 years old? Do the 'minor' rules not apply in this case for some reason? Just asking the question.
Jim
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.025 seconds to generate ]