Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 25/04/24 05:42:49 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 16425.10.1.2

Subject: Re: Re: I agree with Piet......

Date: Tue 07/06/05 11:27:20 GMT

Name: Piet

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

Even if the people know that they are photographed, it's still unacceptable. Because they don't know wherefore they are photographed. Wetlook is for many people a sexual issue, so often the innocent girls are used for the sexual satisfaction of somebody.

That can't be right.

In reply to Message (16425.10.1)

Re: I agree with Piet......

By WETINRED - stekz@cableone.net Mon 06/06/05 14:18:04 GMT

Website: http://www.wetinred.com

...in that I do think it's an invasion of privacy if the subjects have no idea that they r being photographed. However, Candid filming in a group of ppl, when they know they're being photographed, and would be posted on a website, would be acceptable. The stuff that wet Brian and Leon do in a candid situation, know they're being photographed. And I do like both scenarios, but lean more toward the professional, more erotic side of wetlook.

In reply to Message (16425.10)

Candid [nt]

By Alabama - Mon 06/06/05 12:57:17 GMT

Website:

(no text)

In reply to Message (16425)

what do you like more candid or professionally photographed ?? [nt]

By jay - joeshoo11@yahoo.com Mon 06/06/05 00:58:03 GMT

Website:

(no text)

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)