Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Thu 28/03/24 23:43:37 GMT |
Message # 14596.2.1 Subject: re: RUBBISH wet hair is it!! Date: Tue 15/02/05 15:42:11 GMT Name: frenkie |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I agree with the original poster, it doesn't mean anything to me unless her hair is wet, wet up to the neck is NO GOOD, shes got to have wet hair!!!!!!
As to whether its attached to her body, WTF has that got to do with anything? WET is the operative word not LOOK :-|
anyway power to the wet hair fans.
we all enjoy something slightly different and revel in each others finds so let's keep the links coming!! |
In reply to Message (14596.2) If it's permanently attached to the body, it ain't wetlook!! Period! [nt]
By Frankie - Tue 15/02/05 15:33:14 GMT (no text) |
In reply to Message (14596) Should wethair be wetlook too?
By Longwethairlover - im12hitem@yahoo.com Tue 15/02/05 13:57:23 GMT I was thinking that long wet hair should be wetlook. Think about it, it does cover the woman like clothing doesnt' it? I love to see long wet hair, maybe we cater towards that a little bit more, though I know it has some nudity? Maybe when a SC gets her hair wet we could include that too? Just some random thoughts from a lover of long beautiful (especially wet) hair... |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.016 seconds to generate ]