Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Sat 27/04/24 05:38:07 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 12508.4.4

Subject: Re: [Semi-official statement from Eromaxx.net crew]

Date: Wed 06/10/04 21:52:28 GMT

Name: Robert_2

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

It's nice to see that someone actually seems to care. So here's my $0.02:

As said before, I've been a member of Get-Wet for quite some time now. I really liked most of the sets you had back in 2003. In my opinion, going back to your roots would be a *very* good idea!

I'd really like to see some sets again, which contain the following:

*Proper lighting:

Especially the latest Wetmaniaxx sets are *very* bad.

*Clothing:

Different, more casual clothing (jeans, tops, shirts etc.)

Not mostly formal clothes like dresses and blouses, this gets *very* boring and uninteresting after a couple of sets.

*More clothed pics:

No clothes ripping or stripping to nudity after only a couple of pics! I don't care if this happens at the end, but the majority of those pics should be still fully clothed (and also completely wet, not like in the shampoo pics where you can hardly see *any* wet clothes)!

*Different locations:

like pool, tub, lake etc. This has also been great in most of your older pics.

I know, this sounds like a lot of changes... but this is just what Get-Wet and Allwam once looked like. It would be really nice to see this again. That would even be a reason for me to re-join.

In reply to Message (12508.4)

[Semi-official statement from Eromaxx.net crew]

By Michal - michal+mxmov@communicon.biz Wed 06/10/04 02:07:10 GMT

Website: http://eromaxx.net/

Hi there,

first of all - let me introduce myself: I'm part of the eromaxx.net crew, taking care basically about server stuff, member problems, security incidents and so on.

I'm quite sad to hear/read such replies about decreasing quality of the content ... I haven't seen it coming.

Anyway, this discussion is really alarming to all of us at Communicon (company which runs Eromaxx). I've spent today discussing this with my coworkers and with my boss (Robert) ... trying to find a way to fix this situation to customer's satisfaction.

Basically we're willing to change the site back where you (customers) want it to be, but we need serious feedback on the issues, not just bitter text saying "it's all wrong".

So, in order to kick our site back on the right track, please provide me some kind of valuable (and sane) feedback, if you can (and please be thorough, if possible).

I've already read the comments about porn + wet-games vs. wetlook scenes ... but I still think this is just tip of the iceberg. Can you please help me discower what's under the water? (ie. what exactly we're missing?)

Any of your input would be greatly appreciated and I can promise you I will try as hard as I can to make our sites as great as they once were (according to you).

Please, talk to me.

Michal

In reply to Message (12508)

About Eromaxx, a dissapointment

By POlice - Tue 05/10/04 01:17:37 GMT

Website:

below you find posted avi's from eromaxx.net. This started out as a great site, if pricey at $70 per month. But two months ago (you'll notice that those avi's stop in August), eromaxx discontinued some of its sites and cut its wetlook update schedule by about 2/3. So, a site that had five or six great wetlook sets per week now offers only about two or three a month. Not really worth $70 a month anymore.

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)