Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Thu 25/04/24 10:35:20 GMT |
Message # 11701.1 Subject: (mud vs. water) should have been the title [nt] Date: Mon 16/08/04 08:40:34 GMT Name: the lone taper |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
(no text) |
In reply to Message (11701) No Subject
By the lone taper - Mon 16/08/04 08:36:44 GMT Website: mud vs. water i need to pump in during this discussion - because i have been wondering - the name of this forum is WETLOOK - there is no WAM in that title - and I respect the person who runs that website and puts it right in the title - there is something real sexy of wet, form fitting clothes - i believe that is the attraction - when other substances are added it is not the same fetish - and some of them are down right degrading to women - WAM and wetlook are NOT THE SAME THING - when i go to a Rolling Stones forum they do not talk about The Beatles even if they are both music - as Seinfeld says"... not that there is anything wrong with it..." if messy is your thing - then there must be a messy forum - is there not enough people JUST into wetlook to keep this forum alive? - thanks for reading - but this has confused me for a while |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.032 seconds to generate ]