Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 29/03/24 02:23:02 GMT |
Message # 11166.14 Subject: Forum Date: Fri 16/07/04 22:10:18 GMT Name: Micheal Wessex |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Leonmoomin said: "The truth being, even if i was welcome in your forum, I wouldn't go there other than to monitor your hypocrassy. Go into politics lads, it would really, really suit you."
Leonmoomin, shut up.
Nigel Said: "As you may be aware, a certain company, that will remain unnamed, has set up a rival forum. They're 'tactics' in doing this follow their general business model - claim we're the best, slag off the competition, persuade people to boycott the competition etc."
Why is it rival? It's completely different to your forum. Why is it competition? Don't all businesses claim they are the best - surely thats the point of a business. What money do they incur from the forum?
Nigel Wrote If you want dull, predictable, highly staged, uneventful wetlook, then try another forum.
Are your wetlook videos not highly staged and predictable? Come on, Nigel.
If free or candid wetlook is competition to Styx, then why does/has Graham hosted many free websites, like mine, and invested time in producing them?
Nigel, as much as admire your work, you need to come up with a bit more punch than this to validate your argument.
This original issue was raised due to the morality of staging candid activities with a view to selling the results and breaking peoples right to privacy. I would be pretty pissed off if I saw myself plastered all over the internet on a FETISH site, which is what this is. If you look at it from another angle, it's nothing more than voyeur.
The wetlook community does not need to be split down the middle. No one is out to get the other - it's a common interest. Looking at some of the recent posts, though, makes this forum look like an old ladies bickering contest.
Sorry for bringing this up again, but I'm just so angry and feel I need to make my point. I missed the original thread as I was in hospital. |
In reply to Message (11166) Attempts to undermine this forum - Sir Watermelon etc
By Nigel - nigel@wetlook.com Thu 15/07/04 22:26:55 GMT Website: www.wetlook.com As you may be aware, a certain company, that will remain unnamed, has set up a rival forum. They're 'tactics' in doing this follow their general business model - claim we're the best, slag off the competition, persuade people to boycott the competition etc.
Despite what they would wish, this forum is not going to close, or change. Postings of ANY type of wetlook (provided the people are of age) are welcome here, we do not ban candid (naturally or spontaneously without being posed), public, or involuntary wetlook, nor do we ban erotic, nude, or 'pornographic' wetlook.
If you want dull, predictable, highly staged, uneventful wetlook, then try another forum.
The 'others' have been actively persuading people to boycott this forum. I'm NOT saying that they are behind the 'Sir Watermelon' posts, but all these people are all the same. They are just trying to disrupt the forum, in the hope that either I will get fed up and shut it down, or that people will get fed up with all the rubbish and go elsewhere.
Thank you to everyone that emailed me about these postings, please DO NOT reply to them in the forum, unless it's a quick "Rubbish - ignore", please just email me to have them removed.
Thank you for supporting the forum, by visiting and posting. Even if you post elsewhere, you are always welcome to post here as well.
This is an open forum, and anyone who follows our widely accepted rules is always welcome.
Nigel
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.002 seconds to generate ]