Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Mon 06/05/24 02:03:14 GMT |
Message # 9497.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 Subject: I agree ... Date: Mon 05/04/04 05:04:13 GMT Name: Graham (Styx) Email: graham@styxwetworld.com |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I agree. I was just replying to the innacurate post about age 16 being classed as adult in the UK. |
In reply to Message (9497.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1) Re: Re: That's an interesting law
By G.O.P. - Mon 05/04/04 04:41:16 GMT Pictures from Nickelodeon of someone getting slimed are not "pictures of a sexual nature" by anyone's definition, not even the definition of Jerry Falwell! |
In reply to Message (9497.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1) Re: That's an interesting law
By Graham (Styx) - graham@styxwetworld.com Mon 05/04/04 01:35:19 GMT No such phrase as "unconsitutional" in the UK. The law has just been passed or changed and has to be obeyed. |
In reply to Message (9497.1.1.2.1.1.1.1) That's an interesting law
By Waterspaniel - Sun 04/04/04 12:35:58 GMT In the U.S., such ex post facto ("after the fact") laws are unconstitutional. |
In reply to Message (9497.1.1.2.1.1.1) Re: Am I right in thinking theyre adults in the UK
By Graham (Styx) - graham@styxwetworld.com Sun 04/04/04 04:38:20 GMT law changed this year. now the definition of child (in UK) is anyone below 18. also if you are in possesion of pics (of a sexual nature) taken from years ago of someone under 18 it is now an offence- the law was made retrospective. |
In reply to Message (9497.1.1.2.1.1) Am I right in thinking theyre adults in the UK
By Eli - Sun 04/04/04 04:06:58 GMT I think this because soakingstars added the pics from the film they made. he said that he has added these because they are over 16 - which is deemed adult in the UK
Eli |
In reply to Message (9497.1.1.2.1) Re:
By w@mboy - Sun 04/04/04 01:21:24 GMT Website: undefined Hmm, my bad, from what I saw on the UMD forum people were saying they were now 18, sorry.
w@mboy ~Nudity Sucks |
In reply to Message (9497.1.1.2) "Pics removed due to age of subjects"
By Eli - Sun 04/04/04 00:14:46 GMT Seems the fact theyre not 18 yet was found out
Eli |
In reply to Message (9497.1.1) Olsens sliming caps
By w@mboy - Sat 03/04/04 20:05:46 GMT I don't know myself but people on the UMD say they are 18 so here is a link to caps ( http://umd.net/umdforum/viewtopic.php?t=13408 ), a clip will probably be on Wammonkey's site soon, check the UMD for updates.
w@mboy ~Nudity Sucks ~The Olsens Rule :) |
In reply to Message (9497.1) Re: No Subject
By Walt - Sat 03/04/04 13:52:22 GMT Yep, I walked in on my wife watching it as it happened!! Talk about perfect timing... |
In reply to Message (9497) No Subject
By tomoo - tomoo151@aol.com Sat 03/04/04 12:02:38 GMT They just " Slimed " the olson twins on Nickalodean kid choice awards. |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.054 seconds to generate ]