Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Fri 19/04/24 00:33:52 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 74842.2

Subject: Re:Controversial discussion - undeage double standard

Date: Fri 12/10/18 12:08:47 GMT

Name: Wetlongskirts

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

I agree with you, but the lack of responses you've got to this worthwhile topic suggests that some others aren't bothered about it, which is concerning. Clearly, posting wetlook featuring girls known to be underage is completely abhorrent. Where it's not known how old they are, then I think it's right and proper not to post links if they look like they might be underage. Guessing or assuming that they're old enough isn't acceptable in my view. There's plenty of wetlook featuring women who obviously are old enough, so there's no need to have to resort to borderline instances.

I also agree that it doesn't matter who it is who posts such links either, people should be prepared to call it out whoever it originates from.

In reply to Message (74842)

Controversial discussion - undeage double standard

By GSK - Fri 05/10/18 14:29:15 GMT

Website:

I have been thinking about starting this topic for a long time, a year or two, and I am always reminded of it every time somebody posts candid fountain videos.

The forum rules state th minimum age of the subject of the video should be at least 16 years, with which I fully agree. Now the controversial part. Don't get me wrong, I respect the effort some producers, like MK, put into their candid videos, hiring local videographer talent in Russia, etc.

But many times I can see candid stuff here where the girls are, in my opinion, undrer 16 years old. Other underage posts here like th Pixel Athenas stuff, are (rightly) reported, almost instantly, but there seems to be a higher tolerance for official videos for sale as they are produced by reputable wetlook producers.

I realise that sometimes it is difficult to ascertain the age of the girl in a fountain video, but there should be - in my opinion - a simple rule spelled out in 6 words rhyme I learned from a friend:

"If in doubt, neg it out", meaning, if you are nor sure, you don't use the footage.

How is it possible that we have this double standard? Or am I wrong?

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)